This is the first blog in a series on attachment theory explained. It covers attachment styles, what they are, how they can impact your relationships and more, and how to move towards a more secure attachment style…
Have you ever caught yourself doing something and thought, why am I reacting like this? Or why do I always do that?
Maybe it’s not just one thing – it’s a shape you can trace across your whole history. You get a few months into a relationship, everything’s going well, and something in you quietly starts looking for the exit, even though nothing’s obviously wrong. Maybe you can point to the same moment in almost every relationship you’ve had: not a blow-up, just a quiet withdrawal right as things start to deepen, and you genuinely can’t explain why. Perhaps you’re only ever drawn to the person who’s a little unavailable; a little unsuitable, while the steady, reliable person barely registers on your radar. It could even be that taking the “lone wolf” path feels safer than any connection ever could.
Or the opposite: the moment a partner takes longer than usual to text back, you’re convinced something’s shifted, replaying the last conversation for anything you might have said wrong, even though they were just busy. Closeness and commitment rarely feel enough to be secure in the situation and there is always an underlying fear. You’re seeking reassurance, on high alert – looking for the smallest signs and signals that someone’s had enough, trying to please and appease, perhaps tolerating the intolerable. You’re losing sight of yourself.
Or maybe it’s less about one clear moment and more a push-pull rhythm you recognise: a pull towards closeness followed almost immediately by an urge to create distance, so that wanting someone and needing space from them happen in practically the same breath. You’re struggling to trust, always thinking the worst, confusing even yourself with your mixed messages – one minute wanting it all; the next sabotaging what’s there. And even the slightest rupture is too much. Your system can’t handle it and you zone out and shut down.
These patterns (and these are just a few examples) aren’t random, and they’re not a character flaw. And they’re rarely a conscious choice either. They’re called attachment styles, and once you understand where they come from, and what’s actually driving them, they tend to make a lot more sense.
Why does this keep happening, even when I don’t want it to?
When we sometimes question why we’re doing the things we’re doing, it’s a sign that something other than our logical, reasoning mind is running the show.
Most of your attachment pattern isn’t held in the part of you that thinks things through. It formed early in childhood and runs through the more automatic, less conscious parts of your body and brain – the wiring that handles safety and threat before you’re even aware of it, rather than through conscious, reasoning thought.
This is sometimes called implicit memory – protective patterns held in the body and nervous system rather than in conscious recollection. Attachment patterns work in a similar way: pulling away, chasing reassurance, shutting down, quietly testing whether someone’s going to stick around – these can all fire off before the more reflective, conscious part of you has had any say at all. Early on, you learned this was how to stay safe, and when similar situations now arise, these patterns take over running the show.
So when you find yourself retreating right as things get good, or pulled towards someone who echoes an old, familiar kind of unavailability, that’s usually not a failure of insight, and it’s not you self-sabotaging on purpose. It’s your system running a well-practised, much older script – one that, at some point in your life, genuinely kept you safe. The adult, conscious part of you might want closeness and consistency. But that protective part of you says no.
There can be relief in this – knowing that this isn’t a character flaw, or proof that you’re “bad” at relationships. But it also means insight on its own won’t shift it much – you can’t think your way out of an autopilot response. You have to learn to work with the part of you that’s actually running it, gently and patiently, to teach it new ways of safety. That’s what this series is about.
Not sure which style is yours? Then my Attachment Style Quiz is just for you. Send me an email and I’ll whizz it over to you.
What is an attachment style?
Your attachment style is the pattern you learned, very early in life, for how to get safety – survival needs like food and shelter on a very basic level – plus love and connection from your primary caregivers.
As small children, we’re completely dependent on our caregivers. So our nervous system does something remarkably clever: it studies what works. No caregiver gets it right every time. That’s not realistic, and it’s not what a child actually needs. What seems to matter more is that things are mostly warm, attuned and available, and that when it wobbles, a short temper, a distracted moment, a misunderstanding, there’s a way back to feeling okay again afterwards. A child who gets enough of that experience learns something important: that connection is secure and a rupture isn’t a catastrophe. That’s what’s called secure attachment.
It’s rarely down to one parent doing one thing “wrong”, and it’s almost never just one moment. Most of us had a mix of experiences, sometimes from more than one caregiver, and temperament plays a part too. Caregivers are also shaped by their own history, and that inevitably affects how they show up. It could be a parent who swung between warm and intensely reactive one day, then distant or hard to reach the next. A caregiver who loves their child deeply but isn’t reachable emotionally. Perhaps they scold for crying, ignore expressions of distress, or expect a child to be independent and manage far more than they were ready for. It could be a parent who, at different times, is both the person a child runs to for comfort and the person a child needs protecting from.
These adaptations show up as three further styles: anxious, avoidant, and disorganised. Most of us are a blend of more than one, with one tending to be dominant, especially under stress.
This was never a flaw – it was a strategy
This is important to take on board: your attachment style was the right response to your childhood.
It wasn’t weakness, or a flaw. It was a young nervous system doing exactly what it needed to do to stay safe and connected with the people it depended on. That strategy deserves gratitude, not judgement, even if it’s not serving you quite so well now that you’re the calm, capable adult you are.
This isn’t just about romantic relationships
When people hear “attachment style” they usually think of it as a dating or marriage thing. It is that, but it’s very rarely only that.
The blueprint you built as a child doesn’t switch off outside romantic relationships. It’s the same nervous system showing up everywhere connection is involved:
You’ll probably notice your style doesn’t show up identically everywhere – you might lean anxious with a partner and quite avoidant at work, for instance. That’s completely normal, though we do tend to have a primary style that shows up under stress.
A quick sketch of each style:
We’ll go much deeper into each of these, and start looking at specific practical ways to move your attachment style towards secure, in the posts ahead.
Remember, your attachment style is not fixed. Just as this pattern was built through repeated experience, it can shift the same way, not through insight alone, but through enough new experiences of safety, repair, and closeness that don’t disappear.
If you want to know when the next blogs are released, sign up to my newsletter using the sign-up box in the website footer below 👇.
Meet your protective younger part
Throughout this series, I’ll keep coming back to one idea: the part of you that learned to shut down, or cling, or brace for impact wasn’t broken. It was protecting you. I’ll sometimes call this your protective younger part, and getting curious about it, rather than fighting it, is where the real movement towards secure attachment begins.
What’s coming next?
Over the next few posts, we’ll take each style in turn – avoidant, anxious, and disorganised – with real examples so you can start to recognise your own patterns, plus practical, gentle steps for moving towards more security in each. We’ll also look at what secure attachment actually feels like, and finish with the things that apply to all of us, whatever our style: repairing after conflict, holding boundaries, and getting curious about vulnerability.
A bit about me, and how I can help
I’m Emma, a life coach working with people, in-person in Durham and online further afield, to unpick patterns exactly like these so they can build a life, and relationships, that feel more like home. This series draws on ideas I come back to often in my coaching space. If any of this sounds good, a natural next step is a free, no-obligation exploratory session, where we can talk about what’s coming up for you and whether working together feels like a good fit. You can find out more about what I do, and how I work, or just drop me a line if you’d rather start with a question.
Not sure which style is yours?
You might be getting a sense of your style from reading this, but it isn’t always clear cut. It is likely you’ll move between all the styles at times – we’re looking for the one that is most dominant. My short Attachment Style Quiz can help. If you’d like a copy, email me and I’ll send it over to you. It will give you a clearer picture of your dominant style, and how the other styles show up for you too – in relationships and beyond.
Next up: Avoidant Attachment: “I am an island”.
P.S. If you want to know when the next blogs are released in this series all about Attachment Theory, sign up to my newsletter using the info box in the website footer below 👇.
